Plaintiff awarded $546,684 in costs in a wrongful dismissal action

Sreya, January 23, 2019

In the recent case of Ruston v Keddco Mfg. the court granted one of the largest cost awards ever against the employer in a wrongful dismissal action.

Here’s what happened.

Keddco fired its president, Scott Ruston, for alleged fraud and breach of fiduciary duty and refused to provide a severance package. Ruston sued Keddco for wrongful dismissal. In response, Keddco brought a counterclaim against Ruston for $1.7 million dollars.

The fraud allegations were not upheld at trial, and the court ordered Keddco to pay Ruston damages of $604,627.09 as follows:

  1. 19 months’ notice
  2. $100,000 in punitive damages for, among other things:
    • intimidating Ruston during the termination
    • making unsubstantiated allegations
    • the unsubstantiated and excessive counterclaim
  3. moral damages in the amount of $25,000.

Generally, the winning party to a lawsuit is awarded a contribution towards their legal fees from the losing party. In this case, the court ordered Keddco to pay $546,684.73 in costs to Ruston. The court justified this enormous cost award because:

  • Ruston was awarded $604,627.09 and successfully defended the counterclaim of $1.75 million. Therefore, the costs were proportionate to the result.
  • Keddco threatened Ruston with expensive litigation if he pursued his wrongful dismissal claim and then proceeded to follow through on the threat.
  • Keddco pursued unfounded allegations of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment, jeopardizing Ruston’s professional and financial future.
  • The counterclaim turned a simple wrongful dismissal action into complex litigation, which meant Ruston had to retain an expert witness at a cost of approximately $30,000.
  • Keddco’s conduct substantially increased the costs of trial preparation and the length of trial by:
    • refusing to admit facts but failing to contest them at trial
    • refusing to provide relevant financial documents until Ruston brought a motion to the court
    • providing will-say statements late
    • relying on only 45 of the 163 documents it produced on the first day of trial; and
    • providing a 25-person witness list on the eve of trial, forcing an adjournment but then only calling two witnesses at trial.
  • Keddco’s lawyer was comparatively unprepared for the trial.
  • As a result of Keddco’s conduct during the litigation, Ruston had to withdraw funds from his RRSP, sell his house below market value and break his car lease.

This case is a stark reminder that unwarranted and frivolous allegations, counterclaims and “hardball” litigation tactics can not only impact an award of damages, but also increase liability for costs.

Back to more posts

Keep your eye out for our 2019 training calendar in the mail this week! Take a quick peek here:… https://t.co/V7LM772Ok8
RT @craignorriscbc: Kids get a day off school when there's a storm , but what about parents? At 740 @CBCKW891, lawyer and HR specialist @Br…
RT @HaleHSS: What questions do you have for our speakers and expert panel on mental stress claims? https://t.co/qus9czIGV6 #mentalstress…

View our Twitter page